Browse Source

Finished reworking docs to clarify points about versioning (fixes #6088)

Kael Shipman 8 years ago
parent
commit
c8c7619a4a
4 changed files with 122 additions and 160 deletions
  1. 35 6
      doc/01-basic-usage.md
  2. 19 82
      doc/02-libraries.md
  3. 5 4
      doc/04-schema.md
  4. 63 68
      doc/articles/versions.md

+ 35 - 6
doc/01-basic-usage.md

@@ -48,7 +48,10 @@ will be identical - the vendor name just exists to prevent naming clashes. For
 example, it would allow two different people to create a library named `json`.
 One might be named `igorw/json` while the other might be `seldaek/json`.
 
-Read more about publishing packages and package naming [here](02-libraries.md)
+Read more about publishing packages and package naming [here](02-libraries.md).
+(Note that you can also specify "platform packages" as dependencies, allowing
+you to require certain versions of server software. See
+[platform packages](#platform-packages) below.)
 
 ### Package Version Constraints
 
@@ -57,8 +60,8 @@ In our example, we're requesting the Monolog package with the version constraint
 This means any version in the `1.0` development branch, or any version that is
 greater than or equal to 1.0 and less than 1.1 (`>=1.0 <1.1`).
 
-Version can be a little confusing in Composer, and version constraints can be specified
-in several ways. Please read [versions](articles/versions.md) for more in-depth information.
+(What the term "version" actually means can be a little confusing in Composer.
+Please read [versions](articles/versions.md) for more in-depth information.)
 
 > **How does Composer download the right files?** When you specify a dependency in
 > `composer.json`, Composer, first takes the name of the package that you've requested
@@ -69,7 +72,7 @@ in several ways. Please read [versions](articles/versions.md) for more in-depth
 >
 > When it finds the right package, either in Packagist or in a repo you've specified,
 > it then uses the versioning features of the package's VCS (i.e., branches and tags)
-> to attempt to find the best match for the version you've specified. Be sure to read
+> to attempt to find the best match for the version constraint you've specified. Be sure to read
 > about versions and package resolution in the [versions article](articles/versions.md).
 
 > **Note:** If you're trying to require a package but Composer throws an error
@@ -108,7 +111,8 @@ folders under `vendor/`.
 
 When Composer has finished installing, it writes all of the packages and the exact versions
 of them that it downloaded to the `composer.lock` file, locking the project to those specific
-versions.
+versions. You should commit the `composer.lock` file to your project repo so that all people
+working on the project are locked to the same versions of dependencies (more below).
 
 ### Installing With `composer.lock`
 
@@ -122,7 +126,7 @@ all dependencies that you've listed in `composer.json`, but it uses the version
 that it finds in `composer.lock` to ensure that the package versions are consistent for everyone
 working on your project. The result is that you have all dependencies requested by your
 `composer.json` file, but that they may not all be at the very latest available versions (since
-some of the dependencies listed in the `composer.lock` file may have released new versions since
+some of the dependencies listed in the `composer.lock` file may have released newer versions since
 the file was created). This is by design, as it ensures that your project never breaks because of
 unexpected changes in dependencies.
 
@@ -176,6 +180,31 @@ Any open source project using Composer is recommended to publish their packages
 on Packagist. A library doesn't need to be on Packagist to be used by Composer,
 but it enables discovery and adoption by other developers more quickly.
 
+## Platform packages
+
+Composer has platform packages, which are virtual packages for things that are
+installed on the system but are not actually installable by Composer. This
+includes PHP itself, PHP extensions and some system libraries.
+
+* `php` represents the PHP version of the user, allowing you to apply
+  constraints, e.g. `>=5.4.0`. To require a 64bit version of php, you can
+  require the `php-64bit` package.
+
+* `hhvm` represents the version of the HHVM runtime (aka HipHop Virtual
+  Machine) and allows you to apply a constraint, e.g., '>=2.3.3'.
+
+* `ext-<name>` allows you to require PHP extensions (includes core
+  extensions). Versioning can be quite inconsistent here, so it's often
+  a good idea to just set the constraint to `*`.  An example of an extension
+  package name is `ext-gd`.
+
+* `lib-<name>` allows constraints to be made on versions of libraries used by
+  PHP. The following are available: `curl`, `iconv`, `icu`, `libxml`,
+  `openssl`, `pcre`, `uuid`, `xsl`.
+
+You can use [`show --platform`](03-cli.md#show) to get a list of your locally
+available platform packages.
+
 ## Autoloading
 
 For libraries that specify autoload information, Composer generates a

+ 19 - 82
doc/02-libraries.md

@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ Composer.
 As soon as you have a `composer.json` in a directory, that directory is a
 package. When you add a [`require`](04-schema.md#require) to a project, you are
 making a package that depends on other packages. The only difference between
-your project and libraries is that your project is a package without a name.
+your project and a library is that your project is a package without a name.
 
 In order to make that package installable you need to give it a name. You do
 this by adding the [`name`](04-schema.md#name) property in `composer.json`:
@@ -29,40 +29,18 @@ name. Supplying a vendor name is mandatory.
 > username is usually a good bet. While package names are case insensitive, the
 > convention is all lowercase and dashes for word separation.
 
-## Platform packages
+## Library Versioning
 
-Composer has platform packages, which are virtual packages for things that are
-installed on the system but are not actually installable by Composer. This
-includes PHP itself, PHP extensions and some system libraries.
+In the vast majority of cases, you will be maintaining your library using some
+sort of version control system like git, svn, hg or fossil. In these cases,
+Composer infers versions from your VCS and you **should not** specify a version
+in your `composer.json` file. (See the [Versions article](articles/versions.md)
+to learn about how Composer uses VCS branches and tags to resolve version
+constraints.)
 
-* `php` represents the PHP version of the user, allowing you to apply
-  constraints, e.g. `>=5.4.0`. To require a 64bit version of php, you can
-  require the `php-64bit` package.
-
-* `hhvm` represents the version of the HHVM runtime (aka HipHop Virtual
-  Machine) and allows you to apply a constraint, e.g., '>=2.3.3'.
-
-* `ext-<name>` allows you to require PHP extensions (includes core
-  extensions). Versioning can be quite inconsistent here, so it's often
-  a good idea to just set the constraint to `*`.  An example of an extension
-  package name is `ext-gd`.
-
-* `lib-<name>` allows constraints to be made on versions of libraries used by
-  PHP. The following are available: `curl`, `iconv`, `icu`, `libxml`,
-  `openssl`, `pcre`, `uuid`, `xsl`.
-
-You can use [`show --platform`](03-cli.md#show) to get a list of your locally
-available platform packages.
-
-## Specifying the version
-
-When you publish your package on Packagist, it is able to infer the version
-from the VCS (git, svn, hg, fossil) information. This means you don't have to
-explicitly declare it. Read [tags](#tags) and [branches](#branches) to see how
-version numbers are extracted from these.
-
-If you are creating packages by hand and really have to specify it explicitly,
-you can just add a `version` field:
+If you are maintaining packages by hand (i.e., without a VCS), you'll need to
+specify the version explicitly by adding a `version` value in your `composer.json`
+file:
 
 ```json
 {
@@ -70,57 +48,16 @@ you can just add a `version` field:
 }
 ```
 
-> **Note:** You should avoid specifying the version field explicitly, because
-> for tags the value must match the tag name.
-
-### Tags
-
-For every tag that looks like a version, a package version of that tag will be
-created. It should match 'X.Y.Z' or 'vX.Y.Z', with an optional suffix of
-`-patch` (`-p`), `-alpha` (`-a`), `-beta` (`-b`) or `-RC`. The suffix can also
-be followed by a number.
-
-Here are a few examples of valid tag names:
-
-- 1.0.0
-- v1.0.0
-- 1.10.5-RC1
-- v4.4.4-beta2
-- v2.0.0-alpha
-- v2.0.4-p1
-
-> **Note:** Even if your tag is prefixed with `v`, a
-> [version constraint](01-basic-usage.md#package-versions) in a `require`
-> statement has to be specified without prefix (e.g. tag `v1.0.0` will result
-> in version `1.0.0`).
-
-### Branches
-
-For every branch, a package development version will be created. If the branch
-name looks like a version, the version will be `{branchname}-dev`. For example,
-the branch `2.0` will get the `2.0.x-dev` version (the `.x` is added for
-technical reasons, to make sure it is recognized as a branch). The `2.0.x`
-branch would also be valid and be turned into `2.0.x-dev` as well. If the
-branch does not look like a version, it will be `dev-{branchname}`. `master`
-results in a `dev-master` version.
-
-Here are some examples of version branch names:
-
-- 1.x
-- 1.0 (equals 1.0.x)
-- 1.1.x
-
-> **Note:** When you install a development version, it will be automatically
-> pulled from its `source`. See the [`install`](03-cli.md#install) command
-> for more details.
-
-### Aliases
+### VCS Versioning
 
-It is possible to alias branch names to versions. For example, you could alias
-`dev-master` to `1.0.x-dev`, which would allow you to require `1.0.x-dev` in
-all the packages.
+Composer uses your VCS's branch and tag features to resolve the version
+constraints you specify in your `require` field to specific sets of files.
+When determining valid available versions, Composer looks at all of your tags
+and branches and translates their names into an internal list of options that
+it then matches against the version constraint you've provided.
 
-See [Aliases](articles/aliases.md) for more information.
+For more on how Composer treats tags and branches and how it resolves package
+version constraints, read the [versions](articles/versions.md) article.
 
 ## Lock file
 

+ 5 - 4
doc/04-schema.md

@@ -255,7 +255,8 @@ Optional.
 ### Package links
 
 All of the following take an object which maps package names to
-[version constraints](01-basic-usage.md#package-versions).
+versions of the package via version constraints. Read more about
+versions [here](articles/versions.md).
 
 Example:
 
@@ -680,9 +681,9 @@ it in your file to avoid surprises.
 
 All versions of each package are checked for stability, and those that are less
 stable than the `minimum-stability` setting will be ignored when resolving
-your project dependencies. Specific changes to the stability requirements of
-a given package can be done in `require` or `require-dev` (see
-[package links](#package-links)).
+your project dependencies. (Note that you can also specify stability requirements
+on a per-package basis using stability flags in the version constraints that you
+specify in a `require` block (see [package links](#package-links) for more details).
 
 Available options (in order of stability) are `dev`, `alpha`, `beta`, `RC`,
 and `stable`.

+ 63 - 68
doc/articles/versions.md

@@ -14,84 +14,79 @@ which may be represented by a branch HEAD or a tag. When you check out that
 version in your VCS -- for example, tag `v1.1` or commit `e35fa0d` --, you're
 asking for a single, known set of files, and you always get the same files back.
 
-In Composer, what's usually referred to casually as a version -- that is,
+In Composer, what's often referred to casually as a version -- that is,
 the string that follows the package name in a require line (e.g., `~1.1` or
 `1.2.*`) -- is actually more specifically a version constraint. Composer
 uses version constraints to figure out which refs in a VCS it should be
-checking out.
+checking out (or simply to verify that a given library is acceptable in
+the case of a statically-maintained library with a `version` specification
+in `composer.json`).
 
-### Tags vs Branches
+## VCS Tags and Branches
+
+*For the following discussion, let's assume the following sample library
+repository:*
+
+```sh
+~/my-library$ git branch
+~/my-library$ 
+~/my-library$ v1
+~/my-library$ v2
+~/my-library$ my-feature
+~/my-library$ nother-feature
+~/my-library$
+~/my-library$ git tag
+~/my-library$ 
+~/my-library$ v1.0
+~/my-library$ v1.0.1
+~/my-library$ v1.0.2
+~/my-library$ v1.1-BETA
+~/my-library$ v1.1-RC1
+~/my-library$ v1.1-RC2
+~/my-library$ v1.1
+~/my-library$ v1.1.1
+~/my-library$ v2.0-BETA
+~/my-library$ v2.0-RC1
+~/my-library$ v2.0
+~/my-library$ v2.0.1
+~/my-library$ v2.0.2
+```
+
+### Tags
 
 Normally, Composer deals with tags (as opposed to branches -- if you don't
 know what this means, read up on
 [version control systems](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Version_control#Common_vocabulary)).
-When referencing a tag, it may reference a specific tag (e.g., `1.1`) or it
-may reference a valid range of tags (e.g., `>=1.1 <2.0`). Furthermore, you
-can add "stability specifiers" to let Composer know that you are or aren't
-interested in certain tags, like alpha releases, beta releases, or release
-candidates, even if they're technically within the numeric range specified
-by the version constraint (these releases are usually considered "unstable",
-hence the term "stability specifier"). 
-
-If you want Composer to check out a branch instead of a tag, you use the
-special syntax described [here](02-libraries.md#branches). In short, if
-you're checking out a branch, it's assumed that you want to *work* on the
-branch and Composer simply clones the repo into the correct place in your
-`vendor` directory. (For tags, it just copies the right files without actually
-cloning the repo.) This can be very convenient for libraries under development,
-as you can make changes to the dependency files your project is actually using
-and still commit them to their respective repos as patches or other updates.
-
-Let's look at an example. Suppose you've published a library whose git repo
-looks like this:
+When you write a version constraint, it may reference a specific tag (e.g.,
+`1.1`) or it may reference a valid range of tags (e.g., `>=1.1 <2.0`, or
+`~4.0`). To resolve these constraints, Composer first asks the VCS to list
+all available tags, then creates an internal list of available versions based
+on these tags. In the above example, composer's internal list includes versions
+`1.0`, `1.0.1`, `1.0.2`, the beta release of `1.1`, the first and second
+release candidates of `1.1`, the final release version `1.1`, etc.... (Note
+that Composer automatically removes the 'v' prefix in the actual tagname to
+get a valid final version number.)
 
-```sh
-$ git branch
-$ 
-$ v1
-$ v2
-$ my-feature
-$ nother-feature
-$
-$ git tag
-$ 
-$ v1.0
-$ v1.0.1
-$ v1.0.2
-$ v1.1-BETA
-$ v1.1-RC1
-$ v1.1-RC2
-$ v1.1
-$ v1.1.1
-$ v2.0-BETA
-$ v2.0-RC1
-$ v2.0
-$ v2.0.1
-$ v2.0.2
-```
+When it has a complete list of available versions from your VCS, it then
+finds the highest version that matches all version constraints in your project
+(it's possible that other packages require more specific versions of the
+library than you do, so the version it chooses may not always be the highest
+available version) and it downloads a zip archive of that tag to unpack in the
+correct location in your `vendor` directory.
+
+### Branches
+
+If you want Composer to check out a branch instead of a tag, there's a special syntax. If you're checking out a branch, it's assumed that you want to *work* on the branch and Composer actually clones the repo into the correct place in your `vendor` directory. (For tags, it just copies the right files without actually cloning the repo.) To get Composer to do this, you need to point it to the branch using the special `dev-*` prefix (or sometimes suffix; see below). 
+
+In the above example, if I wanted to check out the `my-feature` branch, I would specify `dev-my-feature` as the version constraint in my `require` clause. This would result in Composer cloning the `my-library` repository into my `vendor` directory and checking out the `my-feature` branch.
+
+The exception to this is when branch names look like versions. In that case, we have to clarify for composer that we're trying to check out a branch and not a tag. In the above example, we have two version branches, `v1` and `v2`. To get Composer to check out one of these branches, you must specify a version constraint that looks like this: `v1.x-dev`. There are two things to notice here. First, the `.x`: this is an arbitrary string that Composer requires us to append to tell it that we're talking about the `v1` branch and not a `v1` tag (alternatively, you can just name the branch `v1.x` instead of `v1`). Second, notice that in the case of a branch with a version-like name (`v1`, in this case), you append `-dev` as a suffix, rather than `dev-` as a prefix.
+
+### Minimum Stability
+
+There's one more thing that will affect which files are checked out of a library's VCS and added to your project: Composer allows you to specify stability constraints to limit which tags are considered valid. In the above example, notice that the library released a beta and two release candidates for version `1.1` before the final official release. In order to receive those versions when we run `composer install` or `composer update`, we have to explicitly tell composer that we're ok with release candidates and beta releases (and alpha releases, if we want those). This can be done using either a project-wide `minimum-stability` value in `composer.json` or using "stability flags" in version constraints. Read more on the [schema page](04-schema.md#minimum-stability).
 
-Now assume you've got a project that depends on this library and you've been
-running `composer update` in that project since the `v1.0` release. If you
-specified `~1.0` in Composer (the tilde modifier, among others, is detailed
-below), and you don't add a [`minimum-stability`](04-schema.md#minimum-stability)
-key elsewhere in the file, then Composer will default to "stable" as a minimum
-stability setting and you will receive only the `v1.0`, `v1.0.1`, `v1.0.2`,
-`v1.1` and `v1.1.1` tags as the tags are created in your VCS. If you set the
-`minimum-stability` key to `RC`, you would receive the aforementioned tags as
-they're released, plus the `v1.1-RC1` and `v1.1-RC2` tags, but not `v1.1-BETA`.
-(You can see the available stability constraints in order on the
-[schema page](04-schema.md#minimum-stability).
-
-The final important detail here is how branches are handled. In git, a branch
-simply represents a series of commits, with the current "HEAD" of the branch
-pointing at the most recent in the chain. A tag is a specific commit, independent
-of branch. By default composer checks out the tag that best matches the version
-constraint you've specified. However, if you specify the version constraint as
-"v1-dev" (or sometimes "dev-my-branch" -- see the [libraries page](02-libraries.md#branches)
-for syntax details), then Composer will clone the repo into your `vendor`
-  directory, checking out the `v1` branch.
-
-## Basic Version Constraints
+## Writing Basic Version Constraints
 
 Now that you have an idea of how Composer sees versions, let's talk about how
 to specify version constraints for your project dependencies.